Opacity is one of several formally related properties concerned with what an observer can or can't infer about a partially observed system. The others, detectability, diagnosability, non-interference, and a handful of more specialized variants, get studied by the same research groups, in the same venues, often in the same articles. Searching for opacity articles surfaces them constantly, so rather than silently discard every one of them, this page collects a few representative examples of each. The plan is to eventually grow each of these into its own dedicated page, the way opacity itself is split across the rest of this site, rather than leaving them as a single flat holding area indefinitely.
Roughly the opposite goal of opacity: instead of keeping the observer's state estimate imprecise, detectability asks whether that estimate eventually becomes exact. The two properties are built from the same observer/estimator machinery, which is why they're constantly studied side by side.
Will the system eventually and always detect that a specific fault occurred, within some bounded delay? A third sibling alongside opacity and detectability, often grouped together in surveys as the canonical trio of partial-observation verification problems.
An event-level cousin of opacity: rather than an intruder never becoming certain the system is in a secret state, concealability asks that a designated set of secret events never become certain to have occurred, using the same partial-observation eavesdropper model as opacity but operating on events instead of states.
An older, language-based-security notion asking that confidential actions never produce any effect observable by an unauthorized user. Some formulations overlap enough with opacity that they've been described as a kind of opacity themselves.
Keeping a deviation statistically hard for a passive observer to detect, bounding a hypothesis test's success probability rather than reasoning over the observer's state estimate. Close enough to opacity in motivation to surface constantly in the same searches.
A quantitative sibling of opacity that measures leakage via statistical divergence between the observations a secret behavior produces and the observations a designated “cover” behavior produces, rather than via the observer's state estimate.
As defined in this pair of articles, confidentiality is opacity's closest sibling, and easy to mistake for a synonym: an eavesdropper must not recover the secret, but unlike opacity, a designated "friendly" recipient must still be able to. That authorized-recovery requirement is what keeps it a distinct property rather than a renaming of opacity.